Claims for Damaged Goods in International Trade
Damage to goods during international trade is one of the most common and, at the same time, most complex legal issues for merchants, transportation companies, insurers, buyers, and sellers. The diversity of shipping routes, the number of involved parties, differences among national legal systems, and the existence of various documents make these claims highly specialised and dependent on a precise understanding of the applicable rules.
Claims relating to damaged goods are not limited to compensation alone. They often involve analysis of liability, interpretation of contracts, validity of transport documents, and the scope of insurance coverage. In this article, with the guidance of Soroush Salamian Law Firm, the different dimensions of these claims, their legal foundations, follow-up stages, and practical solutions are examined.
The Concept of Cargo Damage in International Trade
Cargo damage refers to any reduction in quality, physical defect, spoilage, breakage, leakage, deformation, or partial loss of goods that occurs during transportation or storage. The damage may be apparent or become visible only after opening the packaging and using the goods.
From a legal perspective, there is an important distinction between apparent damage and concealed damage, because each has different consequences for the timing of objection and filing a claim. In international trade, accurate identification of the type of damage and the time it occurred is fundamental to determining liability.
Main Parties in Damaged Goods Claims
In cargo damage claims, several parties are usually involved. These may include the seller, buyer, transportation company, insurer, and, in some cases, a warehouse or port operator.
Each of these parties may bear legal responsibility depending on the contracts and transaction terms. A clear understanding of each party’s legal position is the first step in bringing an effective claim.
The Role of the Sales Contract in Determining Liability for Cargo Damage
The international sales contract usually determines up to what stage responsibility for the goods remains with the seller and from what point it passes to the buyer. This issue directly affects cargo damage claims. If the contract is drafted properly, it becomes easier to determine which party was responsible at the time the damage occurred.
Lack of clarity in the contract creates the basis for serious disputes.
The Effect of Delivery Terms on Damage Claims
Delivery terms play a decisive role in these claims. They determine how far the seller remains responsible for transport and the condition of the goods, and from which point responsibility transfers to the buyer. In many cases, the main dispute concerns the interpretation of these very terms.
For this reason, careful review of the clauses governing delivery is critical.
The Role of the Bill of Lading and Transport Documents in Proving a Claim
The bill of lading and other transport documents are among the most important evidentiary tools in cargo damage claims. These documents show the condition in which the goods were delivered to the carrier and the condition in which they were received by the consignee.
If the bill of lading records that the consignee received them in that condition, the presumption is that the damage occurred during transit. This places the burden of proof on the carrier.
Carrier Liability for Cargo Damage
From a legal perspective, the carrier is obliged to preserve and transport the goods with the highest degree of reasonable care from the time of receipt until delivery to the consignee. This duty includes selecting an appropriate means of transport, complying with technical standards, properly loading, correctly stowing, securing the cargo, and preventing exposure to damaging factors. Any failure in these matters may constitute negligence and form the basis of carrier liability.
In many legal systems, the starting presumption is carrier liability, and the carrier must prove that the damage was not caused by its own fault. This means that the burden of proving the absence of fault usually rests on the transportation company. The carrier may be released from liability only if it can show that the damage resulted from factors beyond its control, such as severe natural disasters, war, acts of governmental authorities, or the inherent defect of the goods.
The transport contract may also limit the carrier’s liability or set caps on compensation. However, if it is proven that the damage resulted from the carrier’s intentional misconduct or gross negligence, these limitations are usually unenforceable. Therefore, careful review of the transport contract and related documents is essential in determining liability.
The Role of Insurance in Damaged Goods Claims
Transport insurance is one of the main pillars of protection for stakeholders in international trade. Its purpose is to provide prompt compensation and reduce the financial impact of cargo damage. If a loss occurs, the policyholder may first recover its loss from the insurer without immediately commencing litigation against the carrier.
After paying the claim, the insurer has the right to pursue the responsible party and recover the amount paid. This process protects the cargo owner, to a significant extent, from the complexity of direct litigation. However, the key condition for effective use of insurance is familiarity with the policy terms. Some policies cover only specific losses, while others contain broad exclusions.
Failure to pay attention to the type of coverage, liability limits, and claim notification conditions may result in the insurer refusing payment. For this reason, careful review of the insurance policy before shipment is highly important.
Legal Time Limits for Reporting Loss
In cargo damage claims, timing is critical. Laws and contracts usually prescribe specific deadlines for reporting damage. If the consignee does not object within that time period, the presumption may be that the goods were delivered in sound condition.
These deadlines vary depending on the type of transport and the governing rules. In some cases, the time limit is a few days after delivery, while in others it may extend to several weeks or months. Failure to comply with these deadlines may result in the complete loss of the right to claim compensation.
Therefore, it is recommended that any damage be reported immediately in writing to both the carrier and the insurer, and that supporting documents be collected without delay.
How to Document Cargo Damage
Proper documentation is the foundation of every successful claim. The first step is to record the condition of the goods at the time of delivery. This may be done through a written report, an official inspection record, or a notation on transport documents.
Photographing the goods, the packaging, and the damaged area is highly important. It is also advisable to invite third parties, such as a representative of the transportation company or an independent expert, to observe and document the condition of the goods. The more accurate and complete the documentation is, the greater the likelihood that a court, arbitrator, or insurer will accept the claim.
The Role of Expert Assessment in Cargo Damage Claims
An expert plays a key role in determining the cause of the damage, the time of occurrence, and the amount of loss. The expert opinion usually forms the basis for the adjudicating authority’s decision. By examining the goods, transport documents, packaging conditions, and shipping route, the expert can determine whether the damage resulted from carrier negligence or other factors.
In many cases, a fair decision cannot be issued without expert evidence.
Claims Against the Seller in Case of Inadequate Packaging
Proper packaging is part of the seller’s obligations. If the goods were not packed properly and the damage resulted, liability rests with the seller. In that case, the buyer may bring a claim against the seller even if the damage occurred during transport.
Proof of this issue is usually established through expert assessment.
Claims Against the Transportation Company in Case of Negligence
If the damage was caused by improper transport, incorrect stowage, use of an unsuitable vehicle, or improper handling, the transportation company will be responsible. In these claims, the bill of lading, transport contract, and expert reports are of particular importance.
Proof of the transportation company’s negligence may result in an order to pay full or partial compensation.

The Legal Relationship Between Cargo Damage Claims and Delay in Transport Claims
In many commercial cases, cargo damage and transport delay are not examined separately but are closely connected. Prolonged delays in transport may cause spoilage, reduced quality, or the goods becoming unusable, especially for perishable, temperature-sensitive, or short-shelf-life goods. In such situations, cargo damage is treated as a direct consequence of delay.
From a legal perspective, if it is proven that the delay resulted from carrier negligence, the carrier’s liability is not limited to compensation for delay alone, but also includes compensation for the resulting damage. This may increase the carrier’s liability and may even render contractual liability limitations ineffective.
To prove this connection, expert reports, shipment timeline records, tracking documents, and evidence of the condition of the goods before and after transport are highly important. The clearer this connection is established, the greater the chance of success in the claim.
Amicable Settlement of Cargo Damage Claims
Amicable settlement is one of the most effective methods for resolving disputes arising from cargo damage. This method is usually carried out through direct negotiation between the parties or through mediation by third parties. Its main advantage is reducing the time and legal costs of dispute resolution.
Many carriers and cargo owners prefer to reach an agreement as quickly as possible rather than engage in lengthy court proceedings. Complete documentation, a reliable expert report, and a precise loss assessment increase the injured party’s negotiating power. An amicable settlement can also help preserve long-term commercial relations. It is highly important in international trade.

The Role of Arbitration in Cargo Damage Disputes
Arbitration is one of the most important dispute resolution methods in international trade. The parties may provide in the transport contract that their disputes will be resolved through arbitration. This allows disputes to be handled more efficiently and quickly.
Arbitrators usually have practical experience in transportation and trade and can better understand the technical and legal complexities of the case. In addition, arbitral awards are enforceable in many countries. Choosing the appropriate arbitration mechanism, seat of arbitration, and language of proceedings are important points that should be specified in the contract.
Bringing Cargo Damage Claims Before the Competent Court
If the contract does not contain an arbitration clause, or if the parties do not agree to arbitration, the dispute is brought before the competent court. The competent court is usually determined based on the transport contract, the place where the contract was concluded, the place of delivery of the goods, or the place where the damage occurred.
Selecting the wrong forum may delay proceedings or result in the dismissal of the claim. Therefore, careful review of the applicable rules and contract provisions is necessary before filing a claim.
The Importance of Preventing Cargo Damage Claims
Prevention is always less costly and more effective than a cure. Precise drafting of the transport contract, selection of a reputable transportation company, use of appropriate insurance, supervision of packaging, and documentation of transport stages are among the most important preventive measures.
In addition, employee training, use of standard procedures, and continuous monitoring of the transport process can significantly reduce the likelihood of loss.
How to Manage Claims for Damaged Goods in International Trade
Claims involving damaged goods are among the most complex commercial disputes and require legal expertise, prompt action, and precise documentation. Understanding liabilities, using insurance, selecting the appropriate dispute-resolution method, and adopting sound preventive practices can play a decisive role in reducing risk and increasing success in these claims.

Frequently Asked Questions About Claims for Damaged Goods in International Trade
Cargo damage includes any reduction in quality, physical defect, breakage, leakage, deformation, spoilage, or partial loss of goods during transport or storage. The damage may be apparent or concealed, and the time of occurrence is important for determining liability.
The main parties are usually the seller, buyer, transportation company, insurer, and sometimes a warehouse operator or port operator. Each may bear legal responsibility depending on the contract terms and transaction conditions.
The sales contract determines up to what stage responsibility for the goods remains with the seller and from what point it passes to the buyer. Contract clarity makes it easier to determine liability in cargo damage claims.
Delivery terms determine how far the seller remains responsible and from which point responsibility transfers to the buyer. Many disputes arise from the interpretation of these terms.
The bill of lading and transport documents show the condition of the goods at dispatch and delivery. If they indicate the goods were received in sound condition, the burden may shift to the carrier to explain the damage.
The carrier must transport and preserve the goods with reasonable care. Failure to load, stow, handle, or use a suitable transport vehicle may create liability. In many systems, the carrier must prove that the damage was not caused by its fault.
Transport insurance compensates financial loss caused by cargo damage. After payment, the insurer may pursue recourse against the responsible party. Understanding policy terms, exclusions, and liability limits is essential.
Laws and contracts usually set specific deadlines for reporting damage, and these vary by transport type and governing rules. Failure to report within the deadline may result in loss of the right to claim compensation.
Damage should be documented by recording the condition of the goods at delivery, taking photographs of the goods and packaging, involving a carrier representative or independent expert where possible, and preserving transport documents and reports.
An expert determines the cause of damage, the time of occurrence, and the amount of loss. Expert opinion is often a key basis for decisions by courts, arbitrators, and insurers.
If damage is caused by inadequate packaging, the seller may be liable. If damage is caused by improper transport, incorrect stowage, or improper handling, the transportation company may be liable.
Prolonged delay may cause spoilage or loss of quality, especially for perishable or temperature-sensitive goods. If the delay is due to carrier negligence, the carrier may be liable for both delay-related loss and resulting cargo damage.
Through direct negotiation or mediation, supported by complete documentation, reliable expert reports, and a clear loss assessment, parties can often reach a faster and less costly settlement while preserving commercial relationships.
Arbitration provides a specialized and faster method of resolving disputes. The contract may specify the arbitral forum, seat of arbitration, arbitrators, and language of proceedings for a more effective process.
If there is no arbitration clause or the parties do not agree to arbitrate, the dispute is brought before the competent court based on the contract, place of delivery, place of contract formation, or place where the damage occurred.
Important preventive measures include precise drafting of the transport contract, selecting a reputable carrier, obtaining appropriate insurance, supervising packaging, documenting transport stages, and training personnel.
Effective management requires understanding liabilities, using insurance properly, choosing the right dispute resolution method, maintaining precise documentation, and adopting preventive practices to reduce risk and improve the likelihood of success. What does cargo damage mean in international trade?
Which parties are involved in damaged goods claims?
How does the sales contract affect liability for cargo damage?
What is the role of delivery terms in these claims?
Why are the bill of lading and transport documents important in proving a claim?
What is the carrier’s responsibility in cargo damage claims?
What is the role of insurance in damaged goods claims?
What are the legal deadlines for reporting cargo damage?
How should cargo damage be documented?
What is the role of expert assessment in cargo damage disputes?
What claims may be brought against the seller and the transportation company?
What is the relationship between cargo damage claims and delay in transport claims?
How can cargo damage disputes be resolved amicably?
What is the role of arbitration in cargo damage disputes?
When are cargo damage claims brought before a court?
How can cargo damage claims be prevented?
How should damaged goods claims be managed?





