Grounds for Filing a Complaint Against a Transportation Company
A complaint against a transportation company may be pursued when the company breaches a contractual obligation or violates an applicable legal duty. Common grounds include delay in delivery, damage to cargo, loss or misdelivery of goods, overcharging or unauthorized fees, failure to perform agreed services, falsification of transport documents, negligence in packaging or loading, violations of customs or regulatory requirements, and improper conduct by the driver or transport personnel. Under the Iranian Commercial Code and the regulations and directives issued by the Road Maintenance and Transportation Organization, transportation companies are required to comply with safety and hygiene standards, act responsibly, and deliver cargo accurately and on time. Any deviation from these obligations may form the basis of a complaint.
Where the carriage is international, relevant instruments such as the CMR Convention for road transport or maritime shipping regimes may apply, depending on the mode of transport. In all cases, a successful claim generally requires a material or non-material loss and proof of a causal link between the breach and the damage. Supporting documents such as the contract of carriage, consignment note or bill of lading, proof of delivery, photographs of the cargo, and written correspondence should be attached to strengthen the complaint.
What Types of Claims Can Be Filed Against a Transportation Company?
Claims against a transportation company may generally be classified into civil claims and criminal complaints. A civil claim is pursued where the claimant has suffered material or non-material loss and seeks compensation, for example, in cases of delivery delay, cargo damage, or loss of goods. Such claims are typically filed before the General Civil Court having jurisdiction, often the court of the company’s domicile or the place where the contract was concluded or performed, depending on the applicable jurisdictional rules.
A criminal complaint arises where the conduct of the company or its staff constitutes an offense, such as breach of trust, document forgery, fraud, or intentional destruction of property. In such cases, the complainant may file a criminal complaint with the prosecutor’s office or the criminal investigation authorities. In addition, certain matters may be pursued through administrative or regulatory channels, including by filing complaints with the Road Maintenance and Transportation Organization, the Organization for Governmental Discretionary Punishments, or relevant Guild bodies. Selecting the appropriate route depends on the nature of the misconduct and the complainant’s objective. Consultation with counsel experienced in transportation disputes can significantly improve the effectiveness of the chosen strategy.
Required Documents for a Complaint Against a Transportation Company
Strong documentation is essential for an effective complaint. The primary document is the bill of lading, consignment note, or contract of carriage, as it evidences the parties’ agreement and the company’s obligations. Where cargo is damaged or undelivered, supporting materials may include photographs, expert reports, warehouse receipts, delivery acknowledgments, and written correspondence exchanged with the company. If the claim concerns overcharging or hidden fees, payment invoices, bank receipts, or transaction records are important.
Where a criminal complaint is contemplated, a written complaint, formal notices, and the complainant’s identification documents may be necessary. In some cases, reports from traffic police, customs authorities, or insurance companies can be influential evidence. In international disputes, official translations of documents, pro forma invoices, and shipping documents may be required. Careful collection and presentation of these documents substantially increases the likelihood of a successful outcome.

How to File a Civil Claim Against a Transportation Company
To pursue a civil claim, the claimant should prepare a formal statement of claim specifying the relief sought, such as compensation for delay, compensation for damaged cargo, or recovery of the value of lost goods. In Iran, civil claims are generally filed through the electronic judicial services offices using the official forms. The competent court is typically the General Civil Court in the judicial district of the transportation company or the place of contractual performance, subject to procedural rules.
After filing, a hearing date is scheduled, and the defendant is summoned. The court reviews the evidence, hears the parties’ submissions, and may refer the matter to an expert where valuation or technical assessment is required. If liability is established, the court may order damages or compel performance of obligations. Proceedings are governed by the Civil Procedure Code and the principles of civil liability. As a practical measure, it is often advisable to send a formal notice demanding remedy before initiating litigation, as this demonstrates good faith and may encourage settlement.
When Is a Criminal Complaint Against a Transportation Company Possible?
A criminal complaint is appropriate where the company’s conduct, or the conduct of its personnel, meets the elements of a criminal offense. Illustrative examples include intentionally destroying cargo, presenting forged transport documents, refusing delivery after receiving payment with the intent to misappropriate, or engaging in fraudulent practices. Such conduct may be pursued under offenses including breach of trust, fraud, forgery, or damage to another’s property, depending on the facts.
A criminal complaint is generally filed with the Public Prosecutor’s Office in the jurisdiction where the offense occurred or where the company is established. The complainant must provide evidence sufficient to support the allegation. Investigations are conducted by the prosecutor or investigating judge and may lead to measures such as summoning managers, questioning personnel, and, in some cases, securing assets. If an indictment is issued, the case proceeds to the competent criminal court. Because criminal allegations are serious and carry significant consequences, this route should be used only when credible, well-documented evidence exists.

Regulatory Bodies for Complaints Against Transportation Companies
In Iran, several governmental and quasi-governmental bodies may handle transportation-related complaints. A primary oversight authority is the Road Maintenance and Transportation Organization, which supervises road transport companies. Complaints concerning non-delivery, driver misconduct, overcharging, or regulatory violations may be filed with provincial directorates of this organization. The Organization for Governmental Discretionary Punishments may also have jurisdiction in matters involving consumer deception, pricing violations, or certain commercial misconduct.
Industry bodies, including Guild unions and chambers, may address professional and trade-related complaints. In international transport, customs authorities and port-related authorities may be involved, depending on the dispute. Many of these bodies offer online complaint submission systems and typically handle matters more quickly than court proceedings, making them a practical option for lower-value claims or urgent operational issues.
Procedure for Complaints Before the Road Maintenance and Transportation Organization
To file a complaint with the Road Maintenance and Transportation Organization, the complainant generally submits the complaint to the provincial directorate where the violation occurred. Complaints may be filed in person, by telephone, or through the relevant transport system platforms where available. The complainant should provide complete information, including personal details, the company’s name, the consignment note number, the date of the incident, and a clear description of events.
After registration, the case is reviewed by the competent officers and the parties may be invited to a hearing, either in person or by phone. If the violation is established, the organization may impose measures under applicable road transport regulations, including requiring compensation, issuing fines, suspending activity permits, or revoking licenses. Serious matters may be referred to other authorities. If the complainant disputes the outcome, judicial review may be pursued through the Administrative Justice Court. This administrative pathway is typically faster and less costly, and may be suitable where the dispute is of limited value or requires regulatory intervention.
Calculating and Claiming Damages From a Transportation Company
To claim damages, the claimant should first identify the nature of the loss, whether caused by delivery delay, loss or misdelivery, cargo damage, or financial misconduct. Under Article 377 of the Iranian Commercial Code, as cited in practice, where goods are delivered to a carrier and are damaged or not delivered without fault of the cargo owner, the carrier may be liable for compensation. The amount of damages is frequently determined through referral to an official expert, particularly where valuation is disputed.
For example, if goods are damaged during transport, the expert assessment may consider the goods’ current value, transport costs, and related expenses. Where the contract includes a penalty clause, the claimant may rely on it to support a monetary claim. In other cases, courts may assess damages based on market practice and the evidence presented. Delay damages may be calculated by reference to the duration of delay and its effects on subsequent contractual obligations, where properly proven. Documentation such as invoices, expert reports, and banking records is therefore crucial.
Complaints Against an International Transportation Company
When pursuing a complaint against an international transportation company, the first step is to review the contract of carriage and the governing legal clauses. Many international transport contracts include arbitration clauses or designate specialized frameworks under instruments such as CMR. Where such clauses exist, the complainant must generally follow the agreed-upon dispute-resolution mechanism. If no binding clause exists, the dispute may be brought before a competent court or an arbitral tribunal, depending on the applicable law and jurisdiction.
The complainant should prepare supporting documents, including an international bill of lading or consignment note, invoices, inspection reports, and correspondence. In maritime matters, port authorities and other supervisory bodies may be relevant depending on the claim. Transit cargo may also involve customs authorities. International complaints often require English-language pleadings, official translations, and strict compliance with international commercial practice. Legal representation familiar with cross-border disputes and arbitration may materially increase efficiency and enforceability.
Practical Legal Recommendations for a Successful Complaint
Several measures can improve the prospects of success in a complaint against a transportation company. First, the contract of carriage and transport documents should be carefully reviewed and, where possible, prepared under legal oversight. Second, once an issue arises, prompt written notice with supporting evidence should be provided, as verbal communication is rarely sufficient. Third, photographs and videos of packaging, delivery, and the cargo’s apparent condition should be retained.
Fourth, a formal legal notice should be sent demanding compensation or corrective action within a reasonable deadline. Fifth, if the company fails to respond, the complaint should be filed with the appropriate authority, whether a court, prosecutor, or regulatory body, based on the nature of the claim. Sixth, the claim and its legal grounds should be drafted precisely and supported by documents capable of proof. Finally, assistance from a lawyer experienced in transportation disputes can significantly streamline the process and improve the quality of both claims and defenses.
Frequently Asked Questions About Grounds for Filing a Complaint Against a Transportation Company
Common grounds include delivery delays, cargo damage or loss, overcharging, failure to perform contractual obligations, falsification of transport documents, negligence in packaging or loading, customs or regulatory violations, and improper conduct by drivers or transport personnel.
Complaints may be civil, criminal, or administrative. Civil claims seek compensation for loss or damage. Criminal complaints apply where conduct constitutes an offense such as breach of trust, forgery, fraud, or intentional damage. Administrative complaints may be filed with regulatory bodies depending on the issue.
Key documents include the bill of lading or contract of carriage, delivery receipts, photographs, expert reports where applicable, written correspondence, and payment records. For criminal complaints, identification documents and a written complaint are required. For international matters, official translations and shipping documents are often necessary.
A civil claim is filed as a statement of claim before the competent General Civil Court and may result in an order for damages or performance if liability is proven. A criminal complaint is filed with the prosecutor’s office, investigated by the authorities, and may lead to criminal penalties if an offense is established.
What are common grounds for filing a complaint against a transportation company?
What types of complaints can be filed against a transportation company?
What documents are needed to complain against a transportation company?
How do civil and criminal complaints against a transportation company proceed?
Which regulatory bodies can receive complaints against transportation companies?





